"make me an app to track my workouts and stuff, and like show progress, make it nice"
Six words of intent. A dozen silent decisions — platform, scope, data, taste — that your agent makes for you.
the difference
One sentence in. A buildable spec out.
The same idea, handed to an agent two ways. Guess which one survives contact with reality.
GOAL log a workout in under 10 seconds PLATFORM mobile-first web · works one-handed V1 quick-add sets · history · streaks NOT social · wearables · coaching DONE first workout logged in <3 taps
Every blank named — by you, in plain english. Nothing left for the agent to guess.
example — reprompter's questions & rebuild for "an app to track my workouts"
how it works
One button between your idea and the build.
No prompt-engineering degree. No blank-page panic. Just a rhythm you can repeat at 2am.
-
01
Say it however
Type your idea the way you'd say it out loud — typos, vibes, and all.
my idea: an app for my basketball team -
02
Answer a few real questions
Reprompter reads your idea and asks what it's missing — platform, scope, edge cases, taste. Usually three to seven questions, made for your project.
? iOS, web, or both?
? who can edit scores — everyone, or just you?
? 3 more… -
03
Approve the rebuild
Your sentence comes back as a structured spec. Edit anything you want, or don't touch a word.
✓ spec ready — 214 words
review or hit enter -
04
Ship the real thing
The spec goes to your coding agent. Same idea, same you — a completely different build.
→ handed to Claude Code
building what you actually meant…
If it takes a prompt, it takes a reprompt.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Windsurf
- aider
ground rules
It asks. You decide. Your agent builds.
- questions, not guesses
- Every blank your prompt leaves is a decision your AI makes for you. Reprompter decides nothing — it asks you while it's still cheap to change.
- plain english in
- Say "make it feel like a cozy cabin". Reprompter translates vibes into checkable requirements your agent can hit.
- remembers your stack
- Its questions learn your project — framework, conventions, pet peeves — so they fit your repo, not a generic template.
- local-first
- The coaching loop can run with the model you choose — including on your own machine. Your code stays in your repo; your prompts go exactly where you send them.
- one button
- No command memorization, no prompt hackery. One button between you and the thing that builds.
faq
Fair questions.
? Do I need to know how to code?+
No — that's the point. You bring the idea and the taste. Reprompter asks the things a technical co-founder would ask, then hands your agent a spec it can build from.
? How is this different from just writing a better prompt myself?+
You can — when you already know what's missing. Reprompter's whole job is finding the blanks: platform, scope, edge cases, what "done" means. You answer; your agent stops guessing.
? Which tools does it work with?+
Anything that takes a prompt — Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, aider. It sits between you and your agent, so it doesn't care which one you pick.
? Does it send my code anywhere?+
The coaching can run locally with the model you choose. Your repo stays in your repo, and prompts only go where you send them. Nothing gets silently added to the middle.
? When can I use it? What will it cost?+
Early access is opening in small batches — join the waitlist and you're in the first group when invites go out. It's free during early access; we'll publish pricing before anything paid ever ships.
early access
Be there when the first invites go out.
Reprompter is onboarding in small batches — real users, real repos, fast fixes. Drop your email and you'll get one message when your invite is ready.
no spam — one email, then silence until your invite.